Projected FPL points
v Chelsea · FDR 4Sat 17 Oct, 12:30
← All players
EVE
James Tarkowski
Everton · Defender · £6.2m
Tarkowski logged 90 minutes from the start against Hull City. Across the season that is 6 starts and 540 minutes, so role security, not the latest points total, is the live question.
View match summary on Live →#19 most owned18.4% ownershipAvailable
Sat 17 Oct, 12:30
Banked FPL points
90 minutes · Started · 2–2Latest match checked
Started against Hull City and played 90 minutes. 3 FPL points.
Official FPL status, match record and listed set-piece orderTarkowski logged 90 minutes from the start against Hull City. Across the season that is 6 starts and 540 minutes, so role security, not the latest points total, is the live question.
22,652 net transfers in is a noticeable market move. With ownership already at 18.4%, buying now is partly a protection decision; the minutes and role still decide whether it is a good one.
Home to Chelsea is an FDR 4 test where clean-sheet floor and attacking involvement need to beat a difficult matchup. The model lands on 5.5 points; use that as a one-week baseline, not the whole transfer case.
This season
The numbers on the board right now.
Gameweek by Gameweek
Starts, minutes and returns. No guesswork.
| GW | Opponent | Score | Minutes | Points | G | A | CS | Bonus | xGI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | at Hull City | 2–2 | 90 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 |
| 5 | v Ipswich Town | 1–0 | 90 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0.02 |
| 4 | at Spurs | 0–0 | 90 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0.01 |
| 3 | v Man Utd | 2–2 | 90 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.03 |
| 2 | at Bournemouth | 1–1 | 90 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.11 |
| 1 | v Crystal Palace | 2–0 | 90 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.05 |
The longer view
One hot Saturday can lie. A full FPL season usually tells you more.
| Season | Points | Starts | Minutes | Goals | Assists | Clean sheets | Bonus | xG | xA | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025/26 | 170 | 37 | 3,330 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 12 | 2.53 | 2.10 | £5.5m → £5.8m |
| 2024/25 | 105 | 33 | 2,922 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 1.32 | 2.33 | £5.0m → £4.7m |
| 2023/24 | 117 | 38 | 3,420 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 10 | 2.55 | 2.66 | £4.5m → £4.6m |
| 2022/23 | 106 | 38 | 3,420 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 13 | 2.97 | 1.89 | £4.5m → £4.1m |
| 2021/22 | 83 | 0 | 3,106 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | £5.0m → £4.9m |
| 2020/21 | 109 | 0 | 3,240 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | £5.5m → £5.3m |
| 2019/20 | 143 | 0 | 3,420 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | £5.0m → £5.5m |
| 2018/19 | 97 | 0 | 3,086 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | £5.0m → £4.7m |
| 2017/18 | 101 | 0 | 2,790 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 | £4.5m → £4.6m |
| 2016/17 | 23 | 0 | 568 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | £4.0m → £4.0m |
What comes next
The run of matches behind the projection.
v Chelsea
FDR 4
at Arsenal
FDR 5
at Newcastle
FDR 3
v Coventry City
FDR 2
at Brentford
FDR 3
v Liverpool
FDR 4
AI FPL xP starts with the official forecast, then adjusts for player quality, expected minutes, set pieces, team strength, venue and FDR. It is a planning number, not a promise.